As Trump moves beyond the first 100 days, looming tensions between North Korea/China and the United States/South Korea continue to make headlines.
What should be Noted is the possible directions that Trump can take when incorporating Russia talks as well as the problems in the middle east consisting of Syria and Iran. With Chinas Lack of Control over North Korea but their continued support of the radical country, Nuclear weapons seem like an unlikely act of force by China. The United States however has the ability to execute an attack on the country with its multiple Naval Ships positioned around the southern peninsula of Korea, in which China would be forced to play its hand and intervene. The result of the option to go to war with North Korea would end in Diplomatic leverage over China in regards to trade as well as a new government that would liberate the citizens of North Korea.
Before I go into how Russia is incorporated into the Diplomatic process of a war in Korea, it is important that I update the majority of people whom get their information from main stream media sources, whether it be FOX or CNN, Republican or democrat, both sides have been defending themselves with little to no truth incorporated. This is only done because of the actual relationship that the United States has with Russia.
Democrats will tell you that the right and Donald Trump have communications with Putin and Russian. Which is not far from the Truth, but where it gets corrupt are the claims that Russia lead the hack on the DNC and have been trying to effect elections in the United States. This is absolutely false and the DNC was hacked by a member of the United States Government. The Intelligence agencies and anyone whom holds a positon of power that claims that Russia hacked the United States Government is saying this to separate Russia and the United States because of the ability they would have together to fix an exponential amount of problems in the world. Problems the Globalists invested a lot of money in (radical Islam, genocide, influx of immigration to destabilize countries as well as gather voters to elect politicians that support their agenda).
Noting that although the public perception is that the United States and Russia have no communication at all and we should hate them in the name of Patriotism, there has never been a time when the United States did not communicate with Russia. Although relations might not have been the best, not communicating with another Super Power in the world would be nothing less than idiotic. For a government to do, and for people to think. Now that you Understand that Trump has had relations with Russia, much like every president and government that preceded him, fixing broken relationships and communications channels with another super power in the world is not a bad thing and can stabilize the middle east.
Trump has the option to use a proxy war with Russia/Syria to implement a new government in Syria and boost his perception of deal maker by bringing an end to the hatred of Russia and have a Public, peaceful relationship. This would all happen by an agreement between Russia and the United States saying that they would go along with the Globalist plot and use the momentum to fuel a peaceful end to a war, with public perception being that “Trump fought back against the Radical Putin and Russia” when really it was more of a sparing match in which both countries came out victorious. Although he would suffer backlash from his own base of supporters they wouldn’t understand the grand plan that would come from a proxy war with Russia.
Glad that we cleared the air on how Russia and the United States are not on as bad of terms as the Main Stream Media would like to portray, and Chinas lack of respect for the United States in terms of them controlling their lap dog which is North Korea is evident. If a war in Korea does happen Russia will be brought to the Table to discuss ways that the Stabilization of North Korea can function going forward. Either by implanting a leader in North Korea that is Pro-Russia or otherwise, this happens by the government change in Syria and putting in a Pro-United States Leader (esentially a trade). When I am saying these leaders are “Pro” this or that, understand that it is mostly a meeting being made as to whom will be their military supplier and their largest trade partner and ally (on paper). Without Super Powers having these smaller countries as allies the only thing we would ever experience between Super Power disagreement would be all out war (WW3).
The Future of the EU & United Nations are fueled by these radical groups and globalist leaders that have been put into power over that last century. The Process for a new World Group much like the UN is being formed and the revolution of Nationalism is currently facing extensive resistance from the Globalist elite. The new group I self-labeled, UNA (United National Allegiance) will be solely focused on countries being self-sufficient. Immigration will not go down but countries will not be forced to conform to influx of immigration demands whether it be Shira Law or anything else. Trade will be bi-lateral and not be focused on these agreements like NAFTA which leave the United States left on the short end of the deal. Stablization in the Middle East is Nessecary to achive this and is why Proxy wars will eventually happen between the Super Powers of the world.